Since arriving at the U, I have been bombarded with issues on women's rights, especially in light of abortion. Over and over there have been arguments going back and forth in the MN Daily over whether or not abortion is right, whether or not a fetus is a person, and whether or not Roe vs. Wade should be overturned. And I have to say, I am so frustrated by men and women alike who argue for abortion based soley on a woman's right to choose. And isn't that what all pro-abortion arguments come down to? Choose to live free of health concerns, financial concerns, and lifestyle infringement concerns that come about when a woman is deciding, "should I have an abortion?"
The most recent editorial in the campus paper that has inspired me to voice my frustrations come from a girl who is obviously very passionate about women's rights. I don't fault her for this, but I do have a problem with the reasons she claims gives a woman to choose whether or not to keep her baby. She gives argument for choosing abortion with the following statements:
1. "It is more unsettling when they [the author of the column she is responding to] imply that the decision to terminate a pregnancy is arrived at lightly and just to escape responsibility."
First of all, I must state clearly that I believe that many women who seek to have abortions are evading the responsibility of their actions. Women who ask the questions she poses--"Can she afford this baby?; Will she have enough time to devote to it?; Will she have the support of her husband, boyfriend, or family?"--are, I believe avoiding the responsibiity it takes to care for another human being. I don't deny that it's a huge sacrifice. I spent enough time taking care of my baby brother rather than hanging out with friends when I was younger to know that. I know potty training is disgusting. I know it's difficult to keep an eye on a child every moment in order to ensure his safety, and I know what happens when you fail to do that and suffer the heartache of seeing the child hurt because you weren't there to protect him. It's hard. But abortion is not the answer. Adoption is a viable option, and I would say, it would be wise to ask yourself why you don't want to carry the child to term and then give it up for adoption. Is it because you don't want to mess up your figure or face the reality that this is, in fact, a human being growing inside of you? As an argument against adoption, this girl claims that it is a hard decision to make, whether or not you want your child to be cared for by another person. Maybe so, but if you care enough about your baby to not want another woman to be its mother, how does that justify killing it instead? The logic simply does not line up, and frankly it's selfish.
another statement she makes:
2. "Halverson's column...also sounded generally disapproving of women having intercourse for anything other than procreative purposes, which leads me to wonder about his real motivation for opposing birth control, Plan B, and abortion."
I don't deny that there are people out there who are blatantly anti-sex for any purpose save procreation. Halverson may in fact be one of them. But this is a ridiculous argument for supporting abortion. So I'm going to leave behind all qualms I have about talking about this straight out and be frank: Sex is meant to be pleasurable, and more importantly it is meant to be the culmination of the ultimate covenant between a man and a woman. It is GOOD because God created it, no, I'll go even further, it is PERFECT the way He created it. Did you know that God commands our joy and that includes sex within the boundaries He set up? In creating sex for our pleasure and His glory, He also lovingly created boundaries for the greatest enjoyment of this act. And did it ever occur to you that having sex outside these boundaries actually LESSENS our joy? Think about it--every time you have sex with someone, you give them a piece of yourself, and even if they receive it with care, there's not that trust or security that is more present within a marriage. And everytime you break up with that person, that piece is destroyed. And when you think about it, these boundaries also cover all the consequences (by which I simply mean plausible outcomes) of sex. We are to have sex with only one person in our lifetime, and it is to be between a man and a woman only within the bounds of marriage, a secure relationship where two people have in fact become one, this union being the foundation of family. How does marriage answer the questions considered by pregnant women who are thinking about abortion?
The author of the article asks:
A.
Can she afford this baby once it is born? Well, when husband and wife work together, one or both of these jobs contribute to the financial responsibilities. Now, it is my opinion that it is ultimately the husband's responsibility to provide for his family, but I understand not everyone shares that opinion. I, myself, grew up in a household where my mother was the main bread-winner. But, case in point, if there are two people supporting one another in having a child, we can see that there are more resources for greater financial support.
B.
Will she have enough time to devote to it? again, with both father and mother present, YES, of course. Not to say it won't be hard or that there isn't great sacrifice involved, but the burden is lightened when shared between two people.
C.
Will she have the support of her husband, boyfriend, or family? Now, I have to admit that I don't really have an answer to this objection. If one or both parties in the marriage are not ready for a child, though, I would think that they both would be mature enough (since we assume they were mature enough to enter into a marriage in the first place) to use preventative measures. Here again, there is still responsibility in having sex even within marriage. As to birth control, I am very uninformed about it, and I have definitely heard that some forms are essentially chemically induced abortions, so here I feel compelled to say that I am going to learn more in order to be able to take a more informed stance on this issue.
Despite this third argument, I hold that the evidence suggests that two people who are committed and responsible enough to marry and therefore be in covenant with one another to take care of the other in all circumstances are certainly better equipped to handle a child. I would definitely argue that women were not meant to raise children on their own. And I would add that, in light of all the considerations one must take into account when having a baby, having sex outside of marriage simply because you want to feel good is not only irresponsible but also unloving! It is unloving not to consider any possible children which may result from having sex, and it is unloving to abort said child just because you don't think you can handle the responsibility, even if you come to that decision after a lot of careful deliberation.
So I think I've sounded a little harsh. But I should say, and this is my last comment on this issue, that I do not feel uncompassionate towards women who are single and pregnant and are considering or have already had an abortion, and I do not judge them. It's a hard issue. I don't know what I would do in that same situation. But the thing that keeps me from backing down from my anti-abortion position is my belief in a loving and sovereign God. I believe He alone has the authority to choose whether a not a child should come into this world, because I don't think that a pregnancy is merely the result of two people having sex. I think God is completely in control of whether or not a woman gets pregnant. Having a baby is a huge issue, but it's an issue in which He calls us, as women, to trust Him completely and follow His leading, not to simply go our own way. Because there is a way that seems right to us, but it is a way that leads to death (literally and figuratively). It's no different from any other aspect of life. He values every life, born or unborn. Why should we take the place of God in deciding who should live or who should die based on our convenience? And what gives us the idea that we possess that right? Our bodies are not our own, but are temples of the Living God. There is mercy for women who have made the wrong choice. There is forgiveness and compassion and love. And there is help for those who are at the point of making the decision.